Иностранные языки
Искусство и культура
Исторические личности
Коммуникации и связь
Литература зарубежная
Литература русская
Военная кафедра
Банковское дело
Биржевое дело
Ботаника и сельское хозяйство
Бухгалтерский учет и аудит
Валютные отношения
Государство и право
Гражданское право и процесс

Monopolistic competition and economic efficiency (Монополистическая конкуренция и экономическая)

Monopolistic competition and economic efficiency (Монополистическая конкуренция и экономическая)

Matyukhin Anton

ICEF, 2nd year, 2nd group.

Tutor: Natalya Frolova.


Monopolistic competition and economic efficiency.

Международный институт экономики и финансов, 2 курс,

Высшая школа экономики.

Year 2000, March.

One of the most important and basic economic issues is the theory of

Market Structure. The meaning of economics as a science is the description

and explanation of different ways of economic agencies’ interactions

through commodities, services, mediums of exchange like money, production

processes and other in order to increase their wellbeing in a materialistic

part of life. The satisfaction, although only partial, of either economic

agency could not be achieved while acting without knowing something about

the market, on which it operates. One can not predict or expect either

producers’ or consumers’ behaviour without knowing general profit and

utility maximising notions and conditions. The structure of a market

provides this information.

The theory of Market Structure divides the markets into four most

distinctive types. The polar ones are the pure competition and pure

monopoly. Between these extreme case lie two imperfectly competitive market

structures: monopolistic competition (the one, which is closer to perfect

or pure competition, and which would be described in this essay) and

oligopoly (closer to monopoly, but has more than one but not many large

operating firms, lower monopolistic power and other distinctive features).

The markets, which combine both the price making of a monopoly with a

large number of suppliers and free- entry conditions of pure competition

are the most popular and wide spread ones. Among these are almost all

retail stores like record shops and clothing shops, food facilities like

restaurants and fast-food enterprises, producers of non-alcoholic beverages

like Coca-Cola or Pepsi and a great variety of others. Because such markets

combine the features of monopoly and competition, they are called

monopolistically competitive. This model is also very interesting and

important tool for analysing such issues as product variety and product

choice. It helps us understand whether the market system leads to the

production of the “right” assortment of goods and services as it is too

expensive to produce all conceivable commodities and there is always a

problem of choice.

There are several characteristic assumptions, which identifies the

monopolistic competition:

1. Sellers are price makers. The reason for this is that unlike in

perfect competition where the product is identical, there is a

slightly differentiated or heterogeneous product. Even if some firm

has a monopolistic right on its trade mark and other firms are not

allowed to produce the identical commodity, they have the opportunity

to produce similar, but slightly different product and compete with it

on the market. The greater is the difference of the firm’s product

from other one’s (can be based even on location), the greater is the

monopolistic power of that firm and the less elastic is the demand

curve for its output. This feature enables it to charge a slightly

different price relative to its competitors without loosing all its

customers. Product differentiation leads to the potentiality for a

firm to affect the price for the good or service it produces. Although

this ability is very limited and depends on the degree of

differentiation, a monopolistically competitive firm faces the

downward sloping demand curve like a monopoly or oligopoly (this is

the main characteristic of every imperfect competition market).

Product differentiation makes this model different from pure competition

model. Economic rivalry takes the form of non-price competition:

1. Product differentiation may be physical (qualitative).

2. Services and conditions accompanying the sale of the product are

important aspects of product differentiation.

3. Location is another type of differentiation.

4. Brand names, advertising and packaging lead to perceived differences.

5. Product differentiation allows producers to have some control over the

prices of their products.

2. Sellers do not behave strategically. As there is a large (like in

perfect competition) number of small firms, we assume, that each of

them does not have a noticeable effect on the price decision of other

producers, while changing the price for its output. Thus, firms do not

take into consideration the expectation of a reaction of their

competitors to their price and output decision. Buyers & sellers are

independently acting.

3. All participants have perfect information.

4. No entry barriers on the market. Neither technological nor legal

barriers to entry exist. This feature is similar to the perfect

competition market.

Firm's goal is to take the pure competition’s demand curve and shift it

in the direction of the monopolist’s demand curve. It does this through

price discrimination. Let us now discuss the profit maximising conditions

and the appropriate price-output decision in the short and long runs.

Profit Maximisation in Monopolistic Competition:

. In SR, firm sets its output quantity where MR = MC and sets price

higher than the perfect competition firm would do and equal to the

demand for this quantity of production.

. If P > ATC at that output, firm earns abnormal or positive economic

profit. (Only possible in SR).

. Existing firms expand the scale of plant in response to SR profits.

In the LR, new firms attracted by the SR profits enter the industry.

Short-run price and output decision (no new entrants):

As any profit- maximising firm,

Monopolistic competitor (when it does not choose to shut down) produces the

output where MC=MR and the result would be economic profit (ABCD, grey



As it was mentioned earlier, the entry on the market is absolutely free

and definitely new firms’ occurrence affects the demand for the particular

firm’s output. First, the share and thus the profit of each firm in the

market decrease with the increasing number of competitors producing the

similar, but non-identical commodities. The demand curve for the firms’

production shifts to the left and at an each price, a seller would be able

to realise less items of its output. Second, as the quantity of similar

goods’ producers increases the elasticity of a demand curve for a single

firm’s product increases. Thus, demand curve becomes flatter with the

growing quantity of close substitutes. This situation is described on the

graph below:

Long-run price and output decision:

New entrants, attracted by abnormal profit, lead to the decrease of each

particular firm’s production by decreasing the demand for it and converge

its profits to zero in LR.


Process of new firms entering the market continues until the average

firm has demand tangent to the LR average cost curve (point B- the point

where it can only break even). At this point the average total costs (ATC)

are equal to average revenue (AR/demand curve), therefore in the long- run

monopolistically competitive firms usually face only normal or zero

economic profit as in perfect competition. But there is a complicating

factor involved with this analysis: some firms might achieve a measure of

differentiation that is not easily duplicated by rivals (patents, location,

etc.) and can realise economic profits even in the long run, but this is a

rather unusual situation.

Now, it is the very time to speak about the monopolistic competition

from the point of view of economic efficiency.

The main issue in welfare economics, which describes not how the economy

works, but how well it works, is the term of economic or Pareto-

efficiency. By definition, “the allocation is Pareto- efficient for a given

set of consumer tastes, resources, and technology, if it is impossible to

move to another allocation, which would make some people better off and

nobody worse off”. To realise the meaning of economic efficiency we must

also recall the definitions of allocative and productive efficiencies:

1. Allocative efficiency occurs when price = marginal cost (P=MC), where

the right amount of resources are allocated to the product.

2. Productive efficiency occurs when price = average total cost (P= ATC),

where production occurs using the least-cost combination of resources.

The monopolistically competitive firm is not allocatively efficient

(misallocate resources as P > MC), but is a productively efficient market

structure (P = ATC) as it maximizes profits and minimizes its costs.

As we see on this graph: 1. Price a firm charges its customers exceeds the

marginal cost in the long- run, suggesting that society values additional

units of output which are not being produced.

2. Firm produces the minimum cost level of output as P = ATC (average-total-

cost level of output).


There is an obvious difference between the point where MC=MR and the

price of a monopolistic competitor (on the graph it is marked as a line

from A to B)- its is called a mark up. And the greater is this mark up, the

greater is the monopolistic power of a firm. Because the demand curve is

still downward sloping, the firm will not reach the long run equilibrium at

the minimum point of the ATC curve. Average costs may also be higher than

under pure competition, due to advertising and other costs involved in

differentiation. If there were fewer firms in industry, each firm could

produce the more effective scale of output, which would be better for

consumers. This excess capacity is the "price" society must pay for product

differentiation. In other words, the price differential paid by the

consumer (price difference between perfect competition and monopolistic

competition) is the "price" of product differentiation. But of course

monopolistic competition provides us many good opportunities important for

our wellbeing: the lure of economic profits causes firms to develop new or

improve their old products in order to compete for customers with other

producers of similar but not identical goods and services.