рефераты
рефераты
Главная
Зоология
Инвестиции
Иностранные языки
Информатика
Искусство и культура
Исторические личности
История
Кибернетика
Коммуникации и связь
Косметология
Криминалистика
Криминология
Криптология
Кулинария
Культурология
Литература
Литература зарубежная
Литература русская
Логика
Военная кафедра
Банковское дело
Биржевое дело
Ботаника и сельское хозяйство
Бухгалтерский учет и аудит
Валютные отношения
Ветеринария
География
Геодезия
Геология
Геополитика
Государство и право
Гражданское право и процесс
Делопроизводство

Purcell


Purcell

5.1.02

Yevgenia Semeina Handel and Purcell sources, spring 2002

Henry Purcell’s Voluntary in D minor

This piece- Z718- occurs without title in British Museum manuscript Add.

31446, ff 9v-10v. The piece starts with a terse fugal exposition in the

traditional manner of voluntaries, almost the same with the Voluntary in

for Double Organ, which appears in the same manuscript. These piece are

very alike for the first page, but then gradually diverge until about

halfway through, they go completely separate ways. According to Shay and

Thompson’s book the copyist of the manuscript was George Holmes (1680-

1721), pupil of John Blow, organist of Lincoln Cathedral from 1704 to 1720.

I would like to compare the manuscript of the Voluntary in D minor with one

of the modern editions of this piece – The Novello edition of 1957, made by

Hugh McLean, and with the edition of The Purcell Society made by Edward

John Hopkins.

In the original the both hands are written on six-line stave, the right it

is in treble clef, except for the very end, where it is in the alto clef.

The left hand starts in tenor clef. A few times during the piece it will

change to bass clef in which the piece ends. The key signature has B flat

but it is missing in couple places thought the piece: bar 17 (left hand),

bar 20 (left hand), bar 52 (left hand). There is also an Alla Breve sign in

the beginning.

1. Hugh McLean changed the Alla Breve sign to the 4/4 sign, while Hopkins’s

edition has Alla Breve in it.

2. In McLean’s edition in bars 8-9 the rhythm and the harmony was changed.

In the manuscript the last beat of bar eight is the resolution of the

previous dominant chord to the tonic sixth chord. It follows by a

modulation through Major tonic sixth chord and the Subdominant to the A

Major. This progression sounds very interesting with its natural seventh.

The editor takes away the resolution on the last beat of bar eight, he

puts it on the first beat of bar nine. And then he puts the G sharp on

the third beat and resolve it to the A minor chord on the last beat of

this bar. By doing this he completely changes the color and the character

of the cadence. The editor does not put these changes in brackets and in

the editorial notes he does not explains why he did them.

In Hopkins’s edition rhythm of bar eight stays the same as in the

manuscript. In bar nine the editor suggests to put g sharp for the third

note in bass.

3. In bar thirteen in the manuscript the fifth note in soprano is F sharp,

which is changed to F natural in the McLean’s edition.

4. In bar nine of the Hugh McLean’s edition rhythm of the second beat in

right hand is changed.

Hugh McLean adds a few trills through the piece, but he put all of them in

5. brackets. And it was very frequent at that period to put some additional

ornamentation for the performance.

There are no additional ornaments in the Edward J. Hopkins’s edition.

In bar twenty-seven of the original there is a little cross above the f

sharp in bass. Hugh McLean decided that this was an indication for the

mistake, like it will be later in bar forty-seven, so he takes away the

shake on that note. In the edition of Purcell Society nothing is left out

in this bar.

In bar forty-seven is another cross mark but here both editions agreed that

it was a mark for the mistake made by copyist of manuscript, he put in the

wrong note.

In the same bar Mr. Hopkins adds the quarter rest for the last beat in left

hand.

In McLean’s edition it is without rest like in the manuscript.

In general, edition of The Purcell Society is more accurate and less edited

although Hugh McLean’s edition is also very close to the original and

except for the changes in bars 9-10 there are not that many differences.

5.01.02

Yevgenia Semeina Handel and Purcell sources, spring

2002

Bibliography

Downes, Ralph. “An organist’s view of organ works.” Henry Purcell. London:

Oxford UP, 1959.

Holman, Peter. Henry Purcell.Oxford UP, 1994.

Hopkins, Edward John, ed. The works of Henry Purcell. Vol. 6, London and

New York: Novello, Ewer and Co, 1895.

McLean, Hugh, ed. Henry Purcell’s organ works. London and New York: Novello

& Company, 1957.

Purcell, Henry. British Museum Manuscript, Add.31446.ff9v-10v.

Shay, Robert, and Thompson. Purcell manuscripts. The principal musical

mources. Cambridge UP, 2000.



© 2009 РЕФЕРАТЫ
рефераты